Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Filaria Journal and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Report of a Scientific Working Group on Serious Adverse Events following Mectizan® treatment of onchocerciasis in Loa loa endemic areas

Open Access Review

Clinical picture and outcome of Serious Adverse Events in the treatment of Onchocerciasis

Kwablah Awadzi

Author Affiliations

Onchocerciasis Chemotherapy Research Centre (OCRC) Hohoe Hospital, Hohoe, Ghana

Filaria Journal 2003, 2(Suppl 1):S6  doi:10.1186/1475-2883-2-S1-S6


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://filariajournal.com/content/2/S1/S6


Published:24 October 2003

©

This article is in the Public Domain

Abstract

Ivermectin (Mectizan®) is the only drug currently recommended for the treatment and control of onchocerciasis. Serious adverse events rarely occur during treatment, except in subjects heavily infected with Loa Loa. This review of drug-related serious adverse events in the treatment of onchocerciasis therefore revisited the pre-Mectizan® reference drugs, DEC and suramin, and other candidate drugs studied extensively for the treatment of human onchocerciasis. The benzimidazole carbamate derivatives and the antibiotic doxycycline were excluded, since no serious adverse events have been reported regarding their use. Using recommended definitions, serious adverse events reported or observed after the use of each drug were summarised, the level of attribution determined, and the results tabulated. Prominence was given to treatment-related deaths. The clinical picture of severe symptomatic postural hypotension is described and used to illustrate the difference between the severity and the seriousness of an adverse event. The epidemiology, management and outcome of serious adverse events are presented. The role of future research is discussed.

Introduction

The efforts made through more than four decades of research yielded ivermectin (Mectizan®) as the only drug to be recommended for the treatment and control of onchocerciasis. The activity against the microfilariae (mf) of Onchocerca volvulus in a single dose of 150–200 μg/kg [1], and against the adult worms on repeated dosage [2-6], testifies to the efficacy of the drug. The distribution, monitoring and management of adverse events in the community by individuals with little medical knowledge are proof that Mectizan® rarely produces Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the onchocerciasis patient. Hence, this contribution to the clinical spectrum of drug-related serious adverse events in the treatment of onchocerciasis also examines the pre-Mectizan® "reference" drugs, diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and suramin, and other drugs studied extensively for the treatment of human onchocerciasis. The drugs and their effects against O. volvulus are listed and summarised in Table 1. There have been no SAEs attributed to mebendazole [7,8], flubendazole [9] albendazole [10-12] or doxycycline [13]. They will therefore not be considered further. In addition, little reference will be made to melarsonyl potassium (not listed) – a potent macrofilaricide that resulted in death from arsenical encephalopathy [14,15].

Table 1. Drugs and their activity against Onchocerca volvulus

Definitions

Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

As defined in the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice [16], a serious adverse event is "any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose a) results in death b) is life-threatening c) requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of an existing hospitalisation d) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or e) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect." A modification to these criteria [17] has included important medical events that may not be immediately life threatening, or result in death or hospitalisation, but that may jeopardize the patient, or require intervention to prevent the other outcomes listed above.

Causality or Attribution

When an adverse event is recorded, the relationship to the medicinal product (causality) needs to be determined, as this has important implications for the future use of the product. Various terms define this relationship. One such set of definitions [17] is as follows:

1) Not related: The experience is clearly related to other factors such as the patient's clinical state, therapeutic intervention or concomitant therapy.

2) Unlikely: The experience was most probably produced by other factors, such as the patient's clinical state, therapeutic intervention or concomitant therapy, and does not follow a known response pattern to the trial product.

3) Possible: The experience follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of product administration, and/or follows a known response pattern to the trial product, but could have been produced by other factors such as the patient's clinical state, therapeutic intervention or concomitant therapy.

4) Probable: The experience follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of product administration, and/or follows a known response pattern to the trial product, and could not have been produced by other factors such as the patient's clinical state, therapeutic intervention or concomitant therapy.

5) Most probable: The experience follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of product administration, and/or follows a known response pattern to the trial product, and could not have been produced by other factors such as the patient's clinical state, therapeutic intervention or concomitant therapy, and either occurs immediately following trial product administration, or improves on stopping the product, or there is positive reaction at the application site.

With the drugs under consideration, adverse events that resulted in death will be summarised, followed by other categories of SAEs and the determination and discussion of causality. Although they are described under separate systems, adverse events tend to be multi-systemic.

SAEs associated with various drugs

Deaths

The administration of a total dose of 10 g of suramin over a period of 19 days to 20 patients resulted in four deaths [18]. Doses in excess of 6.0 g have also resulted in death [19-21]. These were due to over-dosage. However, the deaths of two patients who were treated with what would be currently acceptable doses [22] were also probably due to drug effects. In both cases, the patients complained of oropharyngeal pain, refused to eat or drink and had prolonged diarrhoea; there was no response to corticosteroid therapy. Reports of death in 11% of 592 treated patients, occurring six years after completion of a total dose of 10 g of suramin, [23] and after four years in 6% and 18% of patients in two hyper-endemic villages treated with a total dose of 4–6 g of suramin [22] were possibly related to therapy. Death also occurred in 7 out of 327 patients treated with DEC [24]. All the patients were in poor general health, were malnourished, and had underlying chronic medical conditions. They all lapsed into a coma after taking 225 – 900 mg of the drug over 3 to 8 days, and died 1 to 4 days after the onset of the coma. There was no classical Mazzotti reaction and they failed to respond to supportive therapy and corticosteroids. A young man given low dose DEC under betamethasone cover [25] died on the third day in a state of shock and respiratory distress. His liver and spleen were moderately enlarged prior to treatment. In these DEC-related deaths, it is unlikely that the drug was the cause. The event was most probably produced by other factors, such as the patient's clinical state, other therapeutic intervention or concomitant therapy, and did not follow the known response pattern to DEC. Similarly, the death of an elderly woman from chicken pox two weeks after completing a DEC plus betamethasone course [25] was unlikely to be due to DEC.

Syndromes of collapse and "therapeutic shock"

This brings together accounts of life threatening clinical situations that followed treatment with DEC. They were associated with prostration, syncope, collapse and hypotension [26-28]. The term "therapeutic shock" was coined to describe the clinical status of the patient [29]. These were desperately ill patients with multi-system involvement.

A related but distinct adverse effect is severe symptomatic postural hypotension (SSPH). In the classical case, the pulse and blood pressure are normal while recumbent. On standing for a short while (a few minutes), there is dizziness, weakness or faintness and the patient becomes restless or confused; occasionally syncope occurs. The pulse rate increases in successive recordings, gets fainter and becomes impalpable, whilst blood pressure falls in a similar fashion. On assuming the recumbent position, bradycardia, drowsiness and diaphoresis occur. [30]. Usually, recovery follows rapidly and no treatment is necessary. SSPH has been described after treatment with virtually all microfilaricides except mebendazole [30-33]. It is one of the few adverse events that occurred to the same extent when equipotent doses of DEC and Mectizan® were given to patients with similar intensities of infection with O. volvulus [34]. SSPH is, par excellence, a "severe" adverse event that is usually not "serious" since it is so readily and simply reversible. During the field trials of Mectizan® conducted by the Onchocerciasis Control Programme (OCP) http://www.who.int/ocp/ webcite, several cases of SSPH were recorded in the early stages. The incidence fell dramatically when patients who felt weak or dizzy were asked to remain recumbent and send for the nurse rather than walk to the monitoring station [35]. However, in a few subjects, multiple episodes occur in quick succession. Under these circumstances, intervention that is more specific is required, in order not to jeopardize the patient. It is only then that SSPH becomes an SAE. Two patients who suffered "severe sustained postural hypotension" after Mectizan® [36] fall into this category.

Idiosyncratic reactions

Rarely, collapse with nausea, vomiting, shock, sweating and loss of consciousness have followed the initial injection of suramin [37]. As a precaution, a test dose of 100–200 mg (1 to 2 ml of a 10% solution) injected slowly over 3 minutes was advocated [38].

Dermatology/Skin

Adverse skin reactions to microfilaricides rarely justify hospitalisation, except where extensive secondary infection has followed prolonged scratching. An exception occurs when patients with hyper-reactive onchodermatitis are treated with any microfilaricide. This may result in severe, prolonged itching, an extensive oedema of the skin, and limb swelling. In one report, repeated intravenous corticosteroid injections over 3 days were required to control symptoms [39]. Exfoliative dermatitis is an uncommon late manifestation of suramin therapy [22,40]. A patient treated with suramin in northern Ghana developed exfoliative dermatitis and the palms of the hands and the soles of the feet came off as complete casts ("suramin casts"; Awadzi, unpublished observation).

Lymphatic

Extensive swelling of lymph glands, commonly in the groins, with oedema of the overlying skin extending over the pubis and lower abdomen occurs in heavily infected patients treated with DEC or metrifonate and, rarely, with Mectizan®. Pain is often severe and patients are unable to turn over in bed due to reflex flexion of the hips. At best, they assume the "knee elbow position". They also become rooted to the spot when asked to walk – the "pillar of salt effect" [41].

Gastrointestinal

The administration of metrifonate daily for three or more days resulted in very severe abdominal colic due to the muscarinic effects of accumulated acetylcholine. In one study, abdominal pain occurred in 20 out of 34 patients and was unaffected by belladonna alkaloids started orally two days before and continued for a week. The pain persisted for several days after the completion of treatment [42].

Ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract rarely occurs with suramin. Stomatitis was observed in 1 of 100 patients treated [22]. Much more extensive ulceration was observed in one patient treated in northern Ghana (Awadzi, unpublished observation). Chronic diarrhoea was always an ominous sign of suramin toxicity. A histopathological examination of a chimpanzee after treatment with the equivalent of a 9 g dose of suramin for humans showed the intestines to be the organ most severely affected [43]. These gastrointestinal manifestations were probably due to over-dosage.

Pulmonary

During the OCP Mectizan® trials, in which more than 50,000 persons were treated, life threatening dyspnoea occurred in three patients within 24 hours of treatment [35]. Two were known asthmatics. The author was present during these attacks. One, a young male adult, had experienced asthmatic attacks previously but these had always responded to paracetamol; the post-Mectizan® attack did not. The other, a young adult female had attacks usually at the time of the full moon. Her attack occurred when the moon was full but was much more severe than previously. Multiple episodes occurred and she required intravenous aminophylline injections plus betamethasone therapy. Multiple attacks also occurred in a known asthmatic during the hospital-based trials (Awadzi, unpublished observation). These episodes were possibly related to Mectizan® therapy. The third patient with dyspnoea was a young adolescent male who had laryngeal oedema following an upper respiratory tract infection. His attack was not related to Mectizan® therapy. Recurrent bronchospasm requiring adrenaline therapy occurred 6 hours after treatment with metrifonate in a patient with no previous history [44]. Here also, the attack was possibly related to therapy.

Ulceration of the tracheobronchial tree is a rare manifestation of suramin toxicity. In one unpublished case from northern Ghana, expectoration of a "cast" of a bronchus composed of mucus and blood was observed. The same patient had produced casts of the soles and palms referred to above. He also had stomatitis and buccal ulceration. These manifestations resulted from over-dosage due to an error in the calculation of the total dose of suramin.

Musculoskeletal

A severely painful, acute polyarthritis involving mainly the knees, ankles, wrists, small joints of the fingers, and the elbows has been described following treatment with metrifonate and DEC. It began several days after the onset of therapy, when the peak of the initial reaction had passed, and hence was termed a "secondary reaction" [34,42]. Associated features were fever, sterile joint effusions with polymorphonuclear cells and microfilariae, and a raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Such adverse events have not been reported with Mectizan®. A similar syndrome with a sub-acute course occurred late during suramin therapy or during the post treatment observation phase. In addition, painful immobilisation of the hip joint in a semi-flexed position has been described. This was attributed to a reaction around dead worm bundles lying against the capsule of the joint [45].

Neurological

Cerebral toxicity occurred when the total dose of amocarzine given within 48 hours in the fasting state was 30 mg/kg or greater. When given after a meal, similar effects occurred at 25 mg/kg [46]. This involved 8 out of 39 patients (5/9 at 45 mg, 2/20 at 30 mg/kg and 1/10 at 25 mg/kg). There was mental confusion in all 8 patients. At 45 mg/kg, two patients performed repetitive extension movements of the neck, arms and legs while "searching movements" with the arms occurred in one markedly apathetic patient. Another patient was extremely aggressive and had to be restrained. Other features were inappropriate jocularity, perseveration, failure to concentrate, drowsiness and incontinence. The onset was 30 hours or more after drug administration, lasted from one to 47 hours and was followed by a complete recovery. These adverse events were attributed to the pharmacological properties of the drug.

Vertigo with prostration and incapacitation has been attributed to the mobilisation of microfilariae into the cerebrospinal fluid. The associated headache, nausea and vomiting may also have been of a central nervous system origin. A Parkinsonian-like syndrome lasting for seven days was also observed [47].

Marked proximal muscle weakness involving the neck, shoulder and pelvic girdles, with retention of distal muscle function, occurred after the fifth of a planned six daily dose regimen in one patient treated with metrifonate [42]. There was no sensory deficit. He was bedridden for 3 days. The last dose was omitted. The event was attributed to the nicotinic effects of accumulated acetylcholine.

Constitutional symptoms and other systemic features

Fever, fatigue, general weakness and, rarely, prostration of short duration occur after treatment with microfilaricides. However, with suramin therapy they may be prolonged and herald a grave prognosis. The occurrence of jaundice with amocarzine [46] and suramin therapy [48] was unlikely to be due to drug therapy. Despite the frequency of proteinuria with suramin therapy, no renal associated SAEs have been documented.

Ocular/Visual

Anterior segment inflammation, with iridocyclitis, posterior synechiae and secondary glaucoma, and involvement of the posterior segment with optic neuritis, optic atrophy and visual field defects, have occurred following treatment with DEC and suramin. Lesions of the posterior segment occurred early with DEC treatment [49]. Fluorescein angiography demonstrated leakage of dye from the optic disc and disturbances of the retinal pigment epithelium before ophthalmoscopic changes were apparent [50]. Anterior segment lesions due to suramin did not occur for several weeks and optic atrophy developed after several months [51,52].

Epidemiology of drug-related SAEs in the treatment of onchocerciasis

Adverse effects occurring during the treatment of onchocerciasis may be due to:

1) The intrinsic properties of the drug

2) Therapeutic misadventure

3) The effect on the parasite-microfilariae (death-mobilisation into body fluids), and rarely to the death of the adult worms

4) A progressive disability from pre-existing lesions

5) A coincidental illness occurring in temporal relationship with drug administration or

6) Other factors.

With suramin, metrifonate and amocarzine, intrinsic drug effects are combined with parasite factors in the generation of the adverse events.

Intrinsic properties of the drug

Adverse events may be an expression of the pharmacological properties of the drug. They may have little to do with efficacy against the parasite. The event could be a manifestation of over-dosage either due to pure guesswork in the selection of the dose regimen, as occurred in the early days of suramin therapy [18], to an error in dispensing or administration, as occurred with the Ghanaian patient mentioned above, or to a direct extrapolation of data from animal experiments. In the cattle O. gibsoni model, amocarzine was macrofilaricidal at a dose of 40 mg/kg given daily for 3 days [53]. The equivalent dose in man would be 2000 – 2400 mg given daily for 3 days (total 6000 – 7200 mg). Single doses up to 1600 mg were shown to be safe in the fasting state. However, when 1200 mg were given daily for 2 days (total 2400 mg), severe cerebrotoxicity occurred in 5/9 patients, without any manifestation of a macrofilaricidal effect [46]. On the other hand, SAEs could follow an inexplicable pattern, as occurred during the use of melarsonyl potassium [14,15]

Therapeutic misadventure

Several factors need to be considered in the treatment of any disease, especially if the outcome is not fatal. Here, the application of basic therapeutic principles must predominate over the urge to treat. The health care provider must decide:

1) Whether the patient should be interfered with

2) What alteration in the patient's status one hopes to achieve

3) What other effects the drug may have and whether these would be harmful

4) Whether the likelihood of benefit outweighs the likelihood of damage.

The general medical status of the patient and the presence of coexisting medical conditions greatly influence the outcome of therapy, especially with drugs such as suramin [38]. Some fatalities in the treatment of onchocerciasis may have been due to a lack of consideration of these principles.

Parasite death

For a given dose of a microfilaricide, parasite related SAEs are more likely to occur in patients with high skin and ocular microfilarial loads [35,54]. The reduction in high microfilarial counts in skin predisposes to events that result in hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, while involvement of the ocular/visual system could result in persistent incapacity or disability. Additional factors are the concatenation of severe reactions involving multiple systems, such as occurred in patients with "therapeutic shock" and the coexistence of other filarial parasites, especially L. loa [55]. Gastrointestinal parasites do not appear to contribute significantly to increased morbidity [56].

Other factors

Suramin has important intrinsic toxicity and some of the deaths during the treatment of onchocerciasis have been difficult to explain. However, a proportion of its adverse reputation in onchocerciasis have been due to a "transfer" of SAEs observed in the treatment of trypanosomiasis and pemphigus [48].

The linkage of SAEs to Causality

The attribution of SAEs to the administered drug or trial product requires a consideration of the following factors:

1) Temporal relationship between the administration of the drug and the adverse event.

2) The known response pattern to the drug

3) The subject's underlying clinical state, other therapeutic intervention and concomitant therapy

4) Response to de-challenge (discontinuation of the drug) and re-challenge (repeat exposure to the drug).

In many of the drug-related SAEs described, re-challenge was not possible, practicable or justifiable. Hence, the highest level of attribution (Level 5 or "most probable"), as defined previously, could not be allocated. Otherwise, these SAEs are summarised in Table 2, together with the assigned levels of attribution.

Table 2. Onchocerciasis – SAEs, Drugs administered and the Level of Attribution

Outcome

When the deaths due to over-dosage with suramin and therapeutic misadventures are discounted, drug-related SAEs in the treatment of onchocerciasis rarely include fatalities. SAEs due to the intrinsic toxicity of metrifonate and amocarzine are completely reversible over several days; those due to suramin may last for several weeks. Most of the SAEs associated with the death of microfilariae either resolve spontaneously or respond favourably to therapy within a few days, without any disability or incapacity. The major exception is the effect on the ocular/visual system where visual field loss can be severe (tunnel vision) and irreversible.

Corticosteroids have been used, aided by supportive therapy, in many categories of SAEs. The main indication has been the general status of the patient. Thus, they have been used in patients who are desperately ill or in a state of shock, in patients with multiple episodes of SSPH, in the cerebrotoxicity of amocarzine and for the ulcerative lesions and prostration following suramin therapy. When indicated after microfilaricidal therapy, our practice has been to give a single dose of 200 mg of hydrocortisone sodium hemisuccinate intravenously. Only occasionally has the patient required a second dose. However, with the cerebrotoxicity of amocarzine, this dose was given every 2 hours for 6 to 8 hours. The effect was not as dramatic as with other SAEs. A short course of betamethasone was needed for one of the asthmatics during the OCP studies. Corticosteroid eye drops are needed in the iridocyclitis following DEC or suramin to prevent the formation of adhesions.

The acute polyarthritis of the "secondary phase" responds favourably to paracetamol or aspirin and corticosteroids are not needed. Lymphatic lesions also respond but less promptly. Other drugs used were antihistamines for pruritus and atropine for the abdominal colic of metrifonate.

Conclusions

In the absence of Loa loa infection, the treatment of onchocerciasis with Mectizan® rarely results in SAEs. Most of this presentation therefore focused on a systematic review of SAEs following treatment with DEC, suramin, metrifonate and amocarzine. The benzimidazole carbamate derivatives – mebendazole and albendazole – and the antibiotic doxycycline were not considered, as SAEs were never reported. SAEs associated with suramin, DEC and amocarzine were considerable; in some cases, they were fatal. They serve to emphasise the major leap that occurred with the introduction of Mectizan® for the treatment and control of onchocerciasis. Mectizan® has eliminated the use of DEC (except as a diagnostic agent in the "patch test") and left little justification for the use of suramin. The rarity of SAEs with Mectizan® has made community distribution, by those with little more than the capacity to keep records, feasible. Although Mectizan® has the unique ability to eliminate high microfilarial loads with minimal or no adverse effects, serious adverse events do occur occasionally and care is still needed when the heavily infected Mectizan®-naïve are to be treated. The pathogenesis of the adverse effects remains unknown and requires study. The elucidation is likely to be complex because any proposed mechanisms [57-64] need to explain why Mectizan®, a potent microfilaricide, differs so radically from other agents in the onset, course and severity of adverse events, and the lack of "secondary reactions". A practical consideration is how a knowledge of the pathogenesis will impact on the use of Mectizan® in the field.

Competing interests

None

Acknowledgements

The investigations conducted by the author and referenced in this presentation received financial support from the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control http://www.who.int/ocp/apoc/, the Onchocerciasis Control Programme in West Africa http://www.who.int/ocp/ and the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases http://www.who.int/tdr/.

References

  1. World Health Organization: Onchocerciasis and its Control. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Onchocerciasis Control.

    Technical Report Series 1995, 852:1-104. OpenURL

  2. Chavasse DC, Post RJ, Lemoh PA, Whitworth JA: The effect of repeated doses of ivermectin on adult female Onchocerca volvulus in Sierra Leone.

    Trop Med Parasitol 1992, 43:256-262. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  3. Duke BO, Zea-Flores G, Castro J, Cupp EW, Munoz B: Effects of multiple monthly doses of ivermectin on adult Onchocerca volvulus.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1990, 43:657-664. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Duke BO, Zea-Flores G, Castro J, Cupp EW, Munoz B: Comparison of the effects of a single dose and of four six-monthly doses of ivermectin on adult Onchocerca volvulus.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1991, 45:132-137. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Duke BO, Zea-Flores G, Castro J, Cupp EW, Munoz B: Effects of three-month doses of ivermectin on adult Onchocerca volvulus.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1992, 46:189-194. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Gardon J, Boussinesq M, Kamgno J, Gardon-Wendel N, Demanga N, Duke BO: Effects of standard and high doses of ivermectin on adult worms of Onchocerca volvulus: a randomised controlled trial.

    Lancet 2002, 360:203-210. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Rivas-Alcala AR, Greene BM, Taylor HR, Domiguez-Vazquez A, Ruvalcaba-Macias AM, Lugo-Pfeiffer C, Mackenzie CD, Beltran F: Chemotherapy of onchocerciasis: a controlled comparison of mebendazole, levamisole, and diethylcarbamazine.

    Lancet 1981, 2:485-490. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Awadzi K, Schulz-Key H, Howells RE, Haddock DRW, Gilles HM: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis VIII. Levamisole and its combination with the benzimidazoles.

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1982, 76:459-473. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  9. Dominguez-Vazquez A, Taylor HR, Greene BM, Ruvalcaba-Macias AM, Rivas-Alcala AR, Murphy RP, Beltran-Hernandez F: Comparison of flubendazole and diethylcarbamazine in treatment of onchocerciasis.

    Lancet 1983, 1:139-143. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Awadzi K, Hero M, Opoku O, Buttner DW, Gilles HM: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis. XV. Studies with albendazole.

    Trop Med Parasitol 1991, 42:356-360. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  11. Awadzi K, Hero M, Opoku NO, Buttner DW, Coventry PA, Prime MA, Orme ML, Edwards G: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis XVII. A clinical evaluation of albendazole in patients with onchocerciasis; effects of food and pretreatment with ivermectin on drug response and pharmacokinetics.

    Trop Med Parasitol 1994, 45:203-208. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  12. Cline BL, Hernandez JL, Mather FJ, Bartholomew R, De Maza SN, Rodulfo S, Welborn CA, Eberhard ML, Convit J: Albendazole in the treatment of onchocerciasis: double-blind clinical trial in Venezuela.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1992, 47:512-520. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Hoerauf A, Mand S, Adjei O, Fleischer B, Buttner DW: Depletion of wolbachia endobacteria in Onchocerca volvulus by doxycycline and microfilaridermia after ivermectin treatment.

    Lancet 2001, 357:1415-1416. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Duke BOL: A fatality during treatment of onchocerciasis with Mel W.

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1966, 60:691-692. OpenURL

  15. Duke BO: The effects of drugs on Onchocerca volvulus. 4. Trials of melarsonyl potassium.

    Bull World Health Organ 1970, 42:115-127. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  16. ICH Expert Working Group: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice.

    ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1996, 1-53. OpenURL

  17. World Health Organization: Standard Operating Procedures for Clinical Investigators.

    TDR/TDP/SOP/991 1999, 1-22. OpenURL

  18. Satti MH, Kirk R: Observations on the chemotherapy of onchocerciasis in Bahr el Ghazal Province Sudan.

    Bull World Health Organ 1957, 16:531-540. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Nelson GS: A preliminary report on the out-patient treatment of onchocerciasis with antrypol in the West Nile district of Uganda.

    East Afr Med J 1955, 32:413-429. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  20. Diaz AF: Notes and observations on onchocerciasis in Guatemala.

    Bull World Health Organ 1957, 16:676-681. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  21. Budden FH: Onchocerciasis therapy.

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1959, 53:118-119. OpenURL

  22. Anderson J, Fuglsang H, Marshall TFdC: Effects of suramin on ocular onchocerciasis.

    Tropenmed Parasitol 1976, 27:279-296. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  23. Leveuf JJ: Un essai de traitement de masse en Republique de Mali.

    AFR/ONCH 39 (1961) World Health Organisation (unpublished document) 1961. OpenURL

  24. Oomen AP: Fatalities after treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine.

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1969, 63:548. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  25. Anderson J, Fuglsang H, de CMTF: Effects of diethylcarbamazine on ocular onchocerciasis.

    Tropenmed Parasitol 1976, 27:263-278. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  26. Fuglsang H, Anderson J: Letter: Collapse during treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine.

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1974, 68:72-73. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  27. Rougemont A, Boisson ME, Borges da Silva G, Zander N: Large scale trial of treatment by diethylcarbamazine in a village of Bamako region, Mali, endemic for onchocerciasis.

    Bull World Health Organ 1976, 54:403-410. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  28. Bryceson AD, Warrell DA, Pope HM: Dangerous reactions to treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine.

    Br Med J 1977, 1:742-744. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  29. Salazar Mallen M, Molina Pasquel C, Chavez Nunez M: Prophylaxis of the therapeutic shock produced by diethylcarbamazine.

    Salud Publica Mex 1962, 4:1065-1069. OpenURL

  30. Awadzi K, Gilles HM: Diethylcarbamazine in the treatment of patients with onchocerciasis.

    Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992, 34:281-288. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  31. Awadzi K, Orme ML, Breckenridge AM, Haddock D, Gilles HM: Studies of metrifonate in onchocerciasis.

    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1981, 49(Suppl 5):131-136. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  32. Awadzi K, Dadzie KY, De Sole G, Remme J: Reactions to ivermectin treatment in onchocerciasis patients.

    Acta Leiden 1990, 59:193-199. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  33. Awadzi K, Opoku NO, Attah SK, Addy ET, Duke BO, Nyame PK, Kshirsagar NA: The safety and efficacy of amocarzine in African onchocerciasis and the influence of ivermectin on the clinical and parasitological response to treatment.

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1997, 91:281-296. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Awadzi K, Dadzie KY, Schulz-Key H, Gilles HM, Fulford AJ, Aziz MA: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis. XI. A double-blind comparative study of ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and placebo in human onchocerciasis in northern Ghana.

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1986, 80:433-442. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  35. De Sole G, Remme J, Awadzi K, Accorsi S, Alley ES, Ba O, Dadzie KY, Giese J, Karam M, Keita FM: Adverse reactions after large-scale treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin: combined results from eight community trials.

    Bull World Health Organ 1989, 67:707-719. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  36. Chijioke CP, Okonkwo PO: Adverse events following mass ivermectin therapy for onchocerciasis.

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1992, 86:284-286. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  37. Fain A: Toxic reactions after a single injection of Bayer 205 given for prevention of trypanosomiases.

    Rev Trav Sci Med Congo Belge 1942, 1:137-144. OpenURL

  38. Duke BOL, Thylefors B, Rougement A: Current views on the treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine citrate and suramin.

    Unpublished WHO document WHO/ONCHO/81.156 1981.

    WHO/ONCHO/81.156

    OpenURL

  39. Guderian RH, Anselmi M, Sempertegui R, Cooper PJ: Adverse reactions to ivermectin in reactive onchodermatitis [letter].

    Lancet 1991, 337:188. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  40. Gonzalez Guerra L, Rasi E, Rivas A: Interim report from Venezuela on the treatment of 752 patients with onchocerciasis with sodium suramin.

    Rev Venez Sani Asist Soc Caracas 1964, 29:90-97. OpenURL

  41. Awadzi K: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis II. Quantitation of the clinical reaction to microfilaricides.

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1980, 74:189-197. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  42. Awadzi K, Gilles HM: The chemotherapy of onchocerciasis IV. Further trials with metrifonate.

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1980, 74:355-362. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  43. Gibson DW, Duke BO, Connor DH: Histopathological studies on suramin toxicity in a chimpanzee.

    Trop Med Parasitol 1977, 28:387-405. OpenURL

  44. Fuglsang H, Anderson J: Effects of a single dose of metrifonate on the forest strain of Onchocerca volvulus in Cameroon.

    Tropenmed Parasitol 1977, 28:439-446. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  45. Duke BOL, Anderson J: Onchocerciasis and its treatment.

    Trop Doct 1972, 2:107-114. OpenURL

  46. Awadzi K: Research notes from the Onchocerciasis Chemotherapy Research Centre, Ghana.

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1997, 91:703-711. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  47. Duke BO, Vincelette J, Moore PJ: Microfilariae in the cerebrospinal fluid, and neurological complications, during treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine.

    Tropenmed Parasitol 1976, 27:123-132. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  48. Hawking F: Suramin: with special reference to onchocerciasis.

    Adv Pharmacol Chemother 1978, 15:289-322. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  49. Anderson J, Fuglsang H, de C Marshall TF: Effects of diethylcarbamazine on ocular onchocerciasis.

    Tropenmed Parasitol 1976, 27:263-278. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  50. Bird AC, el-Sheikh H, Anderson J, Fuglsang H: Changes in visual function and in the posterior segment of the eye during treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine citrate.

    Br J Ophthalmol 1980, 64:191-200. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  51. Anderson J, Fuglsang H, de C Marshall TF: Effects of suramin on ocular onchocerciasis.

    Tropenmed Parasitol 1976, 27:279-296. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  52. Thylefors B, Rolland A: The risk of optic atrophy following suramin treatment of ocular onchocerciasis.

    Bull World Health Organ 1979, 57:479-480. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  53. Ciba-Geigy Limited: Clinical Orientation CGP 6140: an antiparasitic agent (onchocerciasis).

    Research and Medical Departments, Ciba-Geigy Limited 1987. OpenURL

  54. Francis H, Awadzi K, Ottesen EA: The Mazzotti reaction following treatment of onchocerciasis with diethylcarbamazine: clinical severity as a function of infection intensity.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1985, 34:529-536. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  55. Gardon J, Gardon-Wendel N, Demanga N, Kamgno J, Chippaux JP, Boussinesq M: Serious reactions after mass treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin in an area endemic for Loa loa infection [see comments].

    Lancet 1997, 350:18-22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  56. Njoo FL, Belling GA, Oosting J, Vetter JC, Stilma JS, Kijlstra A: Concurrent parasitic infections in onchocerciasis and the occurrence of adverse reactions after ivermectin treatment.

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 1993, 48:652-657. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  57. Ackerman SJ, Kephart GM, Francis H, Awadzi K, Gleich GJ, Ottesen EA: Eosinophil degranulation. An immunologic determinant in the pathogenesis of the Mazzotti reaction in human onchocerciasis.

    J Immunol 1990, 144:3961-3969. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  58. Cooper PJ, Guderian RH, Prakash D, Remick DG, Espinel I, Nutman TB, Taylor DW, Griffin GE: RANTES in onchocerciasis: changes with ivermectin treatment.

    Clin Exp Immunol 1996, 106:462-467. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  59. Cooper PJ, Awadzi K, Ottesen EA, Remick D, Nutman TB: Eosinophil sequestration and activation are associated with the onset and severity of systemic adverse reactions following the treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin.

    J Infect Dis 1999, 179:738-742. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  60. Cooper PJ, Beck LA, Espinel I, Deyampert NM, Hartnell A, Jose PJ, Paredes W, Guderian RH, Nutman TB: Eotaxin and RANTES expression by the dermal endothelium is associated with eosinophil infiltration after ivermectin treatment of onchocerciasis.

    Clin Immunol 2000, 95:51-61. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  61. Cooper PJ, Schwartz LB, Irani AM, Awadzi K, Guderian RH, Nutman TB: Association of transient dermal mastocytosis and elevated plasma tryptase levels with development of adverse reactions after treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin.

    J Infect Dis 2002, 186:1307-1313. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  62. Keiser PB, Reynolds SM, Awadzi K, Ottesen EA, Taylor MJ, Nutman TB: Bacterial endosymbionts of Onchocerca volvulus in the pathogenesis of posttreatment reactions.

    J Infect Dis 2002, 185:805-811. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  63. Njoo FL, Hack CE, Oosting J, Stilma JS, Kijlstra A: Neutrophil activation in ivermectin-treated onchocerciasis patients.

    Clin Exp Immunol 1993, 94:330-333. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  64. Njoo FL, Hack CE, Oosting J, Luyendijk L, Stilma JS, Kijlstra A: C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 are elevated in onchocerciasis patients after ivermectin treatment.

    J Infect Dis 1994, 170:663-668. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL