Table 3 |
||||
|
EPIFIL and LYMFASIM predictions of the number of yearly mass treatment rounds that is required to reach a 0.5% microfilaraemia prevalence threshold. Results are shown for mass treatment with a combination diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole, and for various endemicity and coverage levels. The combination treatment is assumed to kill 55% of all adult worms and 95% of the microfilariae, and to interrupt the microfilaria production for 6 months. EPIFIL's predictions were made with a model without acquired immunity. LYMFASIM predictions, from the model with anti-L3 immunity, were added for comparison for an average pretreatment microfilaraemia prevalence of 10%. Details of the variability between LYMFASIM runs are included in the lower part of the table. The EPIFIL predictions were reprinted from [28], with permission from Elsevier |
||||
|
Coverage |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Pretreatment mf prevalence |
60% |
70% |
80% |
90% |
|
|
||||
|
EPIFIL |
||||
|
2.5% |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
|
5% |
9 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
|
10% |
10 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
|
15% |
12 |
9 |
8 |
7 |
|
LYMFASIM a |
||||
|
10% (p5 – p95: 8.8% – 11.4%) |
10 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
|
Details of the 100 simulation runs on which the LYMFASIM estimations were based: |
||||
|
Average mf prevalence, 1 year after last treatment round (p5 – p95) |
0.49 (0.29–0.73) |
0.39 (0.25–0.58) |
0.42 (0.24–0.64) |
0.33 (0.22–0.47) |
|
Number of runs (%) with zero mf prevalence 40 years after start of treatment, out of the total number that |
||||
|
- had achieved the 0.5% threshold |
35/51 (69%) |
79/86 (92%) |
62/70 (89%) |
90/97 (93%) |
|
- had NOT achieved the 0.5% threshold |
16/49 (33%) |
8/14 (57%) |
18/30 (60%) |
1/3 (33%) |
|
|
||||
|
a Based on the average trend in microfilaraemia prevalence of 100 simulation runs. |
||||
|
Stolk et al. Filaria Journal 2006 5:5 doi:10.1186/1475-2883-5-5 |
||||